Monday, October 17, 2011

Pinball

Pinball

Ganja

Contrary to the beliefs of those who advocate the legalization of ganja, the current balanced, restrictive, and bipartisan drug policies with the United States are working reasonably nicely and they've contributed to reductions within the rate of marijuana use in our nation.A number of consumers assume that marijuana was produced illegal by means of some type of process involving scientific, medical, and government hearings; that it was to defend the citizens from what was determined to be a dangerous drug.

Sixteen states and the District of Columbia (DC) now accept that ganja has a legitimate medical use, and countless others are beginning to adopt this position at the same time. But the federal government continues to unfairly recognize ganja as a Schedule I substance, which falsely deems it a medically-useless, highly-abused drug in the similar vein as heroin and ecstasy. marijuana may be the most normally abused illegal drug within the U.S. and worldwide. Those who support its legalization, for medical or for common use, fail to recognize that the greatest costs of marijuana are not related to its prohibition; they are the costs resulting from Ganja use itself. Gettman also emphasized that the administration's failure to address the concern is an unlawful denial of due process. One way or another, the federal government is required by law to acknowledge the petition and formulate a suitable response; it can not merely ignore it and continue to intimidate states where marijuana has been legalized with threats of regulatory crackdowns. And just like the medical cannabis legislation that has already been passed in 15 other states as well as the District of Columbia (DC), the Arkansas medical marijuana law would apply strictly to those with valid medical conditions. The bill would also permit approved patients to grow as much as six ganja plants of their very own at household. The United States Census of 1850 counted 8,327 hemp "plantations" (minimum two,000-acre farm) growing cannabis hemp for cloth, canvas and even the cordage made use of for baling cotton. There are at present 10 states with legislation pending to legalize medical marijuana, such as New York, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts. Future drug policies must be smarter and far more effective in curbing the demand for illegal drugs such as marijuana. Smarter-drug prevention policies will need to start off by reducing illegal drug use among the 5 million criminal offenders who are on parole and probation inside the U.S. They're among the nation's heaviest and most problem-generating illegal drug users. As consumer well being advocate and critic of federal drug policy Mike Adams has pointed out this double standard, with multinational corporations valued above the well being of private citizens, has a pernicious effect on our culture "While hazardous prescription drugs are killing a hundred thousand Americans each year, the DEA does nothing. But when herb smokers light up in private, they're branded criminals and subject to a form of tyranny and oppression that should certainly by no means be tolerated in a free society".

Monday, September 26, 2011

9/27 Why Legalize Marijuana? Legalize Mary Jane, or No? What Do You Think? Please Keep Comments Clean.

     
    Why Legalize Marijuana? Legalize Mary Jane, or No? What Do You Think? Please Keep Comments Clean.    
   
Comment by
September 25, 2011 at 10:09 PM
 
Legalizing pot makes alot of sense...Which is exactly why our corrupt and nonsensical govt will never do it.It will take our economy collapsing completely and our corrupt govt scrambling desperately for any and all possible solutions before theyll even consider it. And even then im doubtful. Theres probably a better chance of their crooked asses admitting to extra-terrestrial contact before theyll do anything that makes as much sense as ending prohibition.
   
     
 
This email was sent to janismartinc.marijauna@blogger.com.
Delivered by Feed My Inbox
PO Box 682532 Franklin, TN 37068
Create Account
Unsubscribe Here Feed My Inbox
 
     

Saturday, September 24, 2011

9/25 Why Legalize Marijuana? Legalize Mary Jane, or No? What Do You Think? Please Keep Comments Clean.

     
    Why Legalize Marijuana? Legalize Mary Jane, or No? What Do You Think? Please Keep Comments Clean.    
   
Comment by
September 21, 2011 at 2:15 PM
 
This hub brings me great clarity, and I am so pleased I found it. I am a self-proclaimed medicinal user (as in, I realize I am doing something illegal). I do not have a MC, because I live in one of the 36 states that has failed to jump on the "Legalize Marijuana" bandwagon.I completely agree with nearly every point made. I use marijuana as my own personal medicine, because I have back pain and random ailments that I simply do not find worthy of unworthy pills. (i.e. the popping of 6 pills) I also use it because my nerves are hyper and like to be easily irritated.HOWEVER, my reasons aside, I will say that marijuana does of course have its negative effects, as any drug does. (and on a side note, it absolutely should NOT be ranked as a Schedule 1 drug) ANYWAY, those negative effects can be but are not limited to: apathy, complacency, lethargy, and some phlegm (although over a year of smoking reguarly and I have never coughed anything like that up). Point is: I smoke responsibly (I didn't used to), and I work full-time so if I wanna stare at a freaking Pepsi can then by golly, I'm going to! Thing is though, I don't find that. When I smoke high quality marijuna, I use my brain to think outside the box and I make lists of things I need/want to do, and guess what... it gives me random motivation. I also use it to enjoy episodes of my favorite television show just a little bit more... how awful am I?The only reason I'm even bothering to post this several years after this hub's publication is because just this morning I had an encounter with my mother. I took one hit out of a personal pipe and the scent lingered in our bathroom even with the window open. My mom starts crying and freaking out to which she says, "I don't know how you can even call yourself a Christian."EXCUUUUUUUUSE ME?!?! How is it any different than someone who has premarital sex? I don't think I heard you tell my best friend, "HOW CAN YOU EVEN CALL YOURSELF A CHRISTIAN?" when she had sex before marriage. In all reality, I did something less harmful to my emotional and physical health than she did by sleeping with random people.I rest my case.
   
   
Comment by
September 21, 2011 at 8:31 AM
 
for pleasure and leisure if u dont want it dont smoke if u want to smoke no one is forcing u...and its better illegal than legal trust me..wether legal or not i will continue to smoke
   
     
 
This email was sent to janismartinc.marijauna@blogger.com.
Delivered by Feed My Inbox
PO Box 682532 Franklin, TN 37068
Create Account
Unsubscribe Here Feed My Inbox
 
     

Monday, September 5, 2011

9/6 Why Legalize Marijuana? Legalize Mary Jane, or No? What Do You Think? Please Keep Comments Clean.

     
    Why Legalize Marijuana? Legalize Mary Jane, or No? What Do You Think? Please Keep Comments Clean.    
   
Comment by
September 4, 2011 at 9:37 AM
 
Many people assume that marijuana was made illegal through some kind of process involving scientific, medical, and government hearings; that it was to protect the citizens from what was determined to be a dangerous drug.The actual story shows a much different picture. Those who voted on the legal fate of this plant never had the facts, but were dependent on information supplied by those who had a specific agenda to deceive lawmakers. You’ll see below that the very first federal vote to prohibit marijuana was based entirely on a documented lie on the floor of the Senate.You’ll also see that the history of marijuana’s criminalization is filled with:RacismFearProtection of Corporate ProfitsYellow JournalismIgnorant, Incompetent, and/or Corrupt LegislatorsPersonal Career Advancement and GreedThese are the actual reasons marijuana is illegal.BackgroundFor most of human history, marijuana has been completely legal. It’s not a recently discovered plant, nor is it a long-standing law. Marijuana has been illegal for less than 1% of the time that it’s been in use. Its known uses go back further than 7,000 B.C. and it was legal as recently as when Ronald Reagan was a boy.The marijuana (hemp) plant, of course, has an incredible number of uses. The earliest known woven fabric was apparently of hemp, and over the centuries the plant was used for food, incense, cloth, rope, and much more. This adds to some of the confusion over its introduction in the United States, as the plant was well known from the early 1600?s, but did not reach public awareness as a recreational drug until the early 1900?s.America’s first marijuana law was enacted at Jamestown Colony, Virginia in 1619. It was a law “ordering” all farmers to grow Indian hempseed. There were several other “must grow” laws over the next 200 years (you could be jailed for not growing hemp during times of shortage in Virginia between 1763 and 1767), and during most of that time, hemp was legal tender (you could even pay your taxes with hemp â€" try that today!) Hemp was such a critical crop for a number of purposes (including essential war requirements â€" rope, etc.) that the government went out of its way to encourage growth.The United States Census of 1850 counted 8,327 hemp “plantations” (minimum 2,000-acre farm) growing cannabis hemp for cloth, canvas and even the cordage used for baling cotton.The Mexican ConnectionIn the early 1900s, the western states developed significant tensions regarding the influx of Mexican-Americans. The revolution in Mexico in 1910 spilled over the border, with General Pershing’s army clashing with bandit Pancho Villa. Later in that decade, bad feelings developed between the small farmer and the large farms that used cheaper Mexican labor. Then, the depression came and increased tensions, as jobs and welfare resources became scarce.One of the “differences” seized upon during this time was the fact that many Mexicans smoked marijuana and had brought the plant with them, and it was through this that California apparently passed the first state marijuana law, outlawing “preparations of hemp, or loco weed.”However, one of the first state laws outlawing marijuana may have been influenced, not just by Mexicans using the drug, but, oddly enough, because of Mormons using it. Mormons who traveled to Mexico in 1910 came back to Salt Lake City with marijuana. The church’s reaction to this may have contributed to the state’s marijuana law. (Note: the source for this speculation is from articles by Charles Whitebread, Professor of Law at USC Law School in a paper for the Virginia Law Review, and a speech to the California Judges Association (sourced below). Mormon blogger Ardis Parshall disputes this.)Other states quickly followed suit with marijuana prohibition laws, including Wyoming (1915), Texas (1919), Iowa (1923), Nevada (1923), Oregon (1923), Washington (1923), Arkansas (1923), and Nebraska (1927). These laws tended to be specifically targeted against the Mexican-American population.When Montana outlawed marijuana in 1927, the Butte Montana Standard reported a legislator’s comment: “When some beet field peon takes a few traces of this stuff… he thinks he has just been elected president of Mexico, so he starts out to execute all his political enemies.” In Texas, a senator said on the floor of the Senate: “All Mexicans are crazy, and this stuff [marijuana] is what makes them crazy.”Jazz and AssassinsIn the eastern states, the “problem” was attributed to a combination of Latin Americans and black jazz musicians. Marijuana and jazz traveled from New Orleans to Chicago, and then to Harlem, where marijuana became an indispensable part of the music scene, even entering the language of the black hits of the time (Louis Armstrong’s “Muggles”, Cab Calloway’s “That Funny Reefer Man”, Fats Waller’s “Viper’s Drag”).Again, racism was part of the charge against marijuana, as newspapers in 1934 editorialized: “Marihuana influences Negroes to look at white people in the eye, step on white men’s shadows and look at a white woman twice.”Two other fear-tactic rumors started to spread: one, that Mexicans, Blacks and other foreigners were snaring white children with marijuana; and two, the story of the “assassins.” Early stories of Marco Polo had told of “hasheesh-eaters” or hashashin, from which derived the term “assassin.” In the original stories, these professional killers were given large doses of hashish and brought to the ruler’s garden (to give them a glimpse of the paradise that awaited them upon successful completion of their mission). Then, after the effects of the drug disappeared, the assassin would fulfill his ruler’s wishes with cool, calculating loyalty.By the 1930s, the story had changed. Dr. A. E. Fossier wrote in the 1931 New Orleans Medical and Surgical Journal: “Under the influence of hashish those fanatics would madly rush at their enemies, and ruthlessly massacre every one within their grasp.” Within a very short time, marijuana started being linked to violent behavior.Alcohol Prohibition and Federal Approaches to Drug ProhibitionDuring this time, the United States was also dealing with alcohol prohibition, which lasted from 1919 to 1933. Alcohol prohibition was extremely visible and debated at all levels, while drug laws were passed without the general public’s knowledge. National alcohol prohibition happened through the mechanism of an amendment to the constitution.Earlier (1914), the Harrison Act was passed, which provided federal tax penalties for opiates and cocaine.The federal approach is important. It was considered at the time that the federal government did not have the constitutional power to outlaw alcohol or drugs. It is because of this that alcohol prohibition required a constitutional amendment.At that time in our country’s history, the judiciary regularly placed the tenth amendment in the path of congressional regulation of “local” affairs, and direct regulation of medical practice was considered beyond congressional power under the commerce clause (since then, both provisions have been weakened so far as to have almost no meaning).Since drugs could not be outlawed at the federal level, the decision was made to use federal taxes as a way around the restriction. In the Harrison Act, legal uses of opiates and cocaine were taxed (supposedly as a revenue need by the federal government, which is the only way it would hold up in the courts), and those who didn’t follow the law found themselves in trouble with the treasury department.In 1930, a new division in the Treasury Department was established â€" the Federal Bureau of Narcotics â€" and Harry J. Anslinger was named director. This, if anything, marked the beginning of the all-out war against marijuana.Harry J. AnslingerAnslinger was an extremely ambitious man, and he recognized the Bureau of Narcotics as an amazing career opportunity â€" a new government agency with the opportunity to define both the problem and the solution. He immediately realized that opiates and cocaine wouldn’t be enough to help build his agency, so he latched on to marijuana and starte
   
     
 
This email was sent to janismartinc.marijauna@blogger.com.
Delivered by Feed My Inbox
PO Box 682532 Franklin, TN 37068
Create Account
Unsubscribe Here Feed My Inbox