| | | | | | | Why Legalize Marijuana? Legalize Mary Jane, or No? What Do You Think? Please Keep Comments Clean. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Many people assume that marijuana was made illegal through some kind of process involving scientific, medical, and government hearings; that it was to protect the citizens from what was determined to be a dangerous drug.The actual story shows a much different picture. Those who voted on the legal fate of this plant never had the facts, but were dependent on information supplied by those who had a specific agenda to deceive lawmakers. Youâll see below that the very first federal vote to prohibit marijuana was based entirely on a documented lie on the floor of the Senate.Youâll also see that the history of marijuanaâs criminalization is filled with:RacismFearProtection of Corporate ProfitsYellow JournalismIgnorant, Incompetent, and/or Corrupt LegislatorsPersonal Career Advancement and GreedThese are the actual reasons marijuana is illegal.BackgroundFor most of human history, marijuana has been completely legal. Itâs not a recently discovered plant, nor is it a long-standing law. Marijuana has been illegal for less than 1% of the time that itâs been in use. Its known uses go back further than 7,000 B.C. and it was legal as recently as when Ronald Reagan was a boy.The marijuana (hemp) plant, of course, has an incredible number of uses. The earliest known woven fabric was apparently of hemp, and over the centuries the plant was used for food, incense, cloth, rope, and much more. This adds to some of the confusion over its introduction in the United States, as the plant was well known from the early 1600?s, but did not reach public awareness as a recreational drug until the early 1900?s.Americaâs first marijuana law was enacted at Jamestown Colony, Virginia in 1619. It was a law âorderingâ all farmers to grow Indian hempseed. There were several other âmust growâ laws over the next 200 years (you could be jailed for not growing hemp during times of shortage in Virginia between 1763 and 1767), and during most of that time, hemp was legal tender (you could even pay your taxes with hemp â" try that today!) Hemp was such a critical crop for a number of purposes (including essential war requirements â" rope, etc.) that the government went out of its way to encourage growth.The United States Census of 1850 counted 8,327 hemp âplantationsâ (minimum 2,000-acre farm) growing cannabis hemp for cloth, canvas and even the cordage used for baling cotton.The Mexican ConnectionIn the early 1900s, the western states developed significant tensions regarding the influx of Mexican-Americans. The revolution in Mexico in 1910 spilled over the border, with General Pershingâs army clashing with bandit Pancho Villa. Later in that decade, bad feelings developed between the small farmer and the large farms that used cheaper Mexican labor. Then, the depression came and increased tensions, as jobs and welfare resources became scarce.One of the âdifferencesâ seized upon during this time was the fact that many Mexicans smoked marijuana and had brought the plant with them, and it was through this that California apparently passed the first state marijuana law, outlawing âpreparations of hemp, or loco weed.âHowever, one of the first state laws outlawing marijuana may have been influenced, not just by Mexicans using the drug, but, oddly enough, because of Mormons using it. Mormons who traveled to Mexico in 1910 came back to Salt Lake City with marijuana. The churchâs reaction to this may have contributed to the stateâs marijuana law. (Note: the source for this speculation is from articles by Charles Whitebread, Professor of Law at USC Law School in a paper for the Virginia Law Review, and a speech to the California Judges Association (sourced below). Mormon blogger Ardis Parshall disputes this.)Other states quickly followed suit with marijuana prohibition laws, including Wyoming (1915), Texas (1919), Iowa (1923), Nevada (1923), Oregon (1923), Washington (1923), Arkansas (1923), and Nebraska (1927). These laws tended to be specifically targeted against the Mexican-American population.When Montana outlawed marijuana in 1927, the Butte Montana Standard reported a legislatorâs comment: âWhen some beet field peon takes a few traces of this stuff⦠he thinks he has just been elected president of Mexico, so he starts out to execute all his political enemies.â In Texas, a senator said on the floor of the Senate: âAll Mexicans are crazy, and this stuff [marijuana] is what makes them crazy.âJazz and AssassinsIn the eastern states, the âproblemâ was attributed to a combination of Latin Americans and black jazz musicians. Marijuana and jazz traveled from New Orleans to Chicago, and then to Harlem, where marijuana became an indispensable part of the music scene, even entering the language of the black hits of the time (Louis Armstrongâs âMugglesâ, Cab Callowayâs âThat Funny Reefer Manâ, Fats Wallerâs âViperâs Dragâ).Again, racism was part of the charge against marijuana, as newspapers in 1934 editorialized: âMarihuana influences Negroes to look at white people in the eye, step on white menâs shadows and look at a white woman twice.âTwo other fear-tactic rumors started to spread: one, that Mexicans, Blacks and other foreigners were snaring white children with marijuana; and two, the story of the âassassins.â Early stories of Marco Polo had told of âhasheesh-eatersâ or hashashin, from which derived the term âassassin.â In the original stories, these professional killers were given large doses of hashish and brought to the rulerâs garden (to give them a glimpse of the paradise that awaited them upon successful completion of their mission). Then, after the effects of the drug disappeared, the assassin would fulfill his rulerâs wishes with cool, calculating loyalty.By the 1930s, the story had changed. Dr. A. E. Fossier wrote in the 1931 New Orleans Medical and Surgical Journal: âUnder the influence of hashish those fanatics would madly rush at their enemies, and ruthlessly massacre every one within their grasp.â Within a very short time, marijuana started being linked to violent behavior.Alcohol Prohibition and Federal Approaches to Drug ProhibitionDuring this time, the United States was also dealing with alcohol prohibition, which lasted from 1919 to 1933. Alcohol prohibition was extremely visible and debated at all levels, while drug laws were passed without the general publicâs knowledge. National alcohol prohibition happened through the mechanism of an amendment to the constitution.Earlier (1914), the Harrison Act was passed, which provided federal tax penalties for opiates and cocaine.The federal approach is important. It was considered at the time that the federal government did not have the constitutional power to outlaw alcohol or drugs. It is because of this that alcohol prohibition required a constitutional amendment.At that time in our countryâs history, the judiciary regularly placed the tenth amendment in the path of congressional regulation of âlocalâ affairs, and direct regulation of medical practice was considered beyond congressional power under the commerce clause (since then, both provisions have been weakened so far as to have almost no meaning).Since drugs could not be outlawed at the federal level, the decision was made to use federal taxes as a way around the restriction. In the Harrison Act, legal uses of opiates and cocaine were taxed (supposedly as a revenue need by the federal government, which is the only way it would hold up in the courts), and those who didnât follow the law found themselves in trouble with the treasury department.In 1930, a new division in the Treasury Department was established â" the Federal Bureau of Narcotics â" and Harry J. Anslinger was named director. This, if anything, marked the beginning of the all-out war against marijuana.Harry J. AnslingerAnslinger was an extremely ambitious man, and he recognized the Bureau of Narcotics as an amazing career opportunity â" a new government agency with the opportunity to define both the problem and the solution. He immediately realized that opiates and cocaine wouldnât be enough to help build his agency, so he latched on to marijuana and starte | | | | | | | | | | | | | |